Promoting the Dead on Facebook.


Late last month, I noticed an odd post in the News Feed of my Facebook mobile app. It was a black-and-white picture of a girl wearing snorkeling goggles and winking at the camera. And it linked back to a page titled, "In Loving Memory of Binland Lee."
In the weeks since then, Facebook showed me more of Lee. The original photo, plus other personal shots—Lee smiling with friends, Lee as a toddler with her mother, Lee swimming in Belize—appeared in my feed again and again.

I don't mind these posts. They don't ask me for anything. I don't have to like them, I don't have to comment on them, I don't even have to visit the page. But they are unsettling to see, especially when sandwiched between status updates from my friends.
Screenshots/Facebook
Lee was a 22-year-old Boston University student who died in a fire in her attic bedroom on April 28, 2013, two weeks before graduation. As the Boston Globe reported, she had come home from a party the night before, gone to bed, then woke up to flames and smoke trapping her inside. And most recently, in August 2014, her family filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the landlord and brokers of the building.
Nothing about the lawsuit or the circumstances of Lee's death—she had been living with 13 other tenants in a building that had a history of overcrowding and code violations—appear on the Facebook page memorializing her. Instead, what I see are photos celebrating Lee's life. There's a Mother's Day card she sent a few years back, a letter she wrote to her childhood best friend, a certificate of membership into her high school's National Honor Society. Scrolling through them, I learn who Lee was: an only child from Brooklyn; a passionate marine biology student; a close friend to many.
But her appearance in my feed baffled me. I didn't know Lee. I had never heard of her before seeing her portrait. I didn't attend Boston University and I don't live in Boston. None of my friends liked or commented on the photo, and, as far as I could tell, none of them had liked the page either.
So what was the memorial page of a stranger doing in my News Feed as a "Suggested Post"?
After the images continued showing up in my feed in January, I wondered if others were confused about seeing the posts as well. Searching on Twitter, I found Abbie Ruzicka, a radio producer for WGBH News in Boston. She tweeted the following last week:
When I reached out to Ruzicka, she told me she was a Boston University alum—that fact, she guessed, coupled with a friend of hers liking the page, probably led to Facebook cycling Lee's photos onto her feed. "To me it seems like they were targeting alumni of BU," she said. "It's just odd. I have never seen an in memoriam page sponsored post before, but that's just my personal experience."
Neither had I, but I figured I had to somehow have a Facebook connection to Lee. It seemed unbelievable the site would suggest an in memoriam page to anyone, so I scoured each of the page's photos for likes or comments from friends. When I found none, I searched Lee's name. Maybe a friend mentioned her in a status? Maybe Lee had the same name as someone who shared a mutual friend with me? Maybe Facebook confused her for someone else?
In the results, I spotted one photo of Lee. A friend of mine—I'll call her "C"—had liked it.
Facebook
Turns out, it's a strange—and thin—thread connecting me and Binland Lee. I hadn't spoken to C since 2006, when we had met at a sleepaway camp and friended each other. When I messaged C, she told me she wasn't close with Lee when they went to BU together. C knew people Lee knew, though, which is why she liked the photo. Most important, C said she had liked the in memoriam page, but because she kept her likes hidden, I couldn't actually see the connection.
For C's like to be the one reason Facebook pushed the page onto my News Feed seemed a flimsy explanation, so I asked Facebook for more information about how an in memoriam page could become a "Suggested Post." After looking at my screenshots, the company emailed me the following conclusion:
This is a sponsored post, so even though you didn't like the Page the Page admin is trying to reach people with a message. You're seeing this because the advertiser wants to reach people like you, meaning you fit the ad targeting criteria they chose when they developed the ad.
In other words, the in memoriam page for Lee acted like any other page on Facebook, so its admin could decide to promote its content and to whom. That didn't make much sense to me, though: The page wasn't solicitous with its posts. There was nothing to sell. The page's About section makes it clear it's a place "dedicated for Binland Lee... for everyone to share memories, photos, and information about upcoming events for Binland."
Facebook also suggested I report the page and stop it from showing up on my News Feed by changing my ad preferences. I didn't want to do that, however, and I didn't feel right doing that. How can you block a page that asks those who see it to remember someone who died?
Facebook clarified its explanation further in another email:
While this page was created in memory of someone that had passed away, the content that is posted on the page is treated the same as the content on any other Facebook page. That means the admin can promote any of the posts that are published to the page, be it a photo, video, or text post. In this case the admin promoted a picture of Binland that was posted on the page, which explains why those kinds of posts were showing up in your News Feed.
Basically, the content on the page was promoted, an old friend had privately liked Binland Lee's in memoriam page, and it all ended up on my News Feed. Facebook doesn't categorize pages based on intention (there's also no option for creating an "in memoriam"-specific page), so the system did what it was told to do and suggested the photos, even if they weren't ads.
Mystery solved! Sort of. Finding out what happened made me uncomfortable for having investigated my connection to the page. It was strange to see Binland Lee's photos, but they weren't appearing accidentally, or even maliciously. If anything, the page was using Facebook the way it's meant to be used, as a publishing platform. I had simply encountered atomized evidence of the post-print obituary section.
More important, Lee's in memoriam page is another reminder the Internet is still figuring out how to handle both users' grief and the "digital litter" left behind by those who have passed away. Facebook solved part of the problem with memorialized profiles ("We understand how difficult it can be for people to be reminded of those who are no longer with them," the company stated in 2009), but the system's not perfect. Its Year in Review for 2014, for example, was criticized when the project's algorithmically generated slideshows showed photos of people who died.
To me, Lee's page shows where the two primary uses of Facebook coincide. The site encourages people to create, to update, to post. As a social media site, it also wants people to connect by liking, commenting, tagging, etc. A page remembering someone who died acts doubly as a space for friends and family to publish memories and as one to help each other grieve.
But when that content leaves the page and that network, those two uses of Facebook conflict. The page becomes context-free when it moves outside the circles of friends and family or even BU alumni. It's jarring for those who didn't know Lee to see photos of her appear unexpectedly under the heading "Suggested Post." These posts include little information, only a digital trail for me to follow.
Yet, that trail did eventually lead me to the Facebook page's creator: Alaina Blay, one of Lee's best friends since the pair attended elementary school together. As soon as she heard the news of Lee's death, Blay turned to the social media site. "I felt like I had to do something right away, to build a community," she told me. "Facebook was the first thing I thought of."
The page then took on a life of its own. It transformed into a hub for people connected to Lee—anyone from her relatives to her acquaintances—to find each other, something Blay found comforting.
"It gives me goosebumps to think of how far the page has gone and how many people you can reach," she said. "When I first made it, I didn't expect so many people that had known Binland to come."
Of course, people who didn't know her also stumbled upon the page—like me. When I told Blay how I learned of Lee's story, she didn't sound surprised. She explained how the news of the lawsuit and housing issues connected to her friend's death drew eyeballs to the digital memorial. Because she's the page's creator, she has received countless messages from people who didn't know Lee but wanted to share their condolences after reading her story.
For those who didn't seek out the page on their own, though, Blay had an explanation. When Lee's mother joined Facebook, Blay made her an administrator for the page. With the two-year anniversary of Lee's death approaching, Lee's mother has taken to posting frequently, as well as promoting some posts—not to spread any message, but simply to honor of her daughter. "It makes her feel better," Blay said.
And so the page isn't just an outlet for grief or a means of communication; it's a source for understanding the life Lee led: whom she befriended, what she loved doing, and where she went. I didn't know Lee and I never expected to learn of her story. But now, I feel like I know her a little better, all because of a single web page on a site that's home to millions of them.
The page may not receive messages of condolences forever—it's already appeared less frequently in my News Feed this week than it did before—but it will continue to be an easily accessible, thoughtfully curated memorial built by Lee's family and friends. And so will other in memoriam pages, even the ones that don't reach strangers in mind-boggling, algorithmic ways.

theatlantic.

Popular posts from this blog

UK GENERAL ELECTIONS:Inquiry announced into memo alleging Sturgeon wants Tory election victory.

Sandhurst's sheikhs: Why do so many Gulf royals receive military training in the UK? A parade outside the building at Sandhurst Continue reading the main story In today's Magazine The death list that names 5,000 victims Is this woman an apostate? Voices from a WW1 prison camp The Swiss selfie scandal Generations of foreign royals - particularly from the Middle East - have learned to be military leaders at the UK's Sandhurst officer training academy. But is that still a good idea, asks Matthew Teller. Since 1812, the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, on the Surrey/Berkshire border, has been where the British Army trains its officers. It has a gruelling 44-week course testing the physical and intellectual skills of officer cadets and imbuing them with the values of the British Army. Alongside would-be British officers, Sandhurst has a tradition of drawing cadets from overseas. Many of the elite families of the Middle East have sent their sons and daughters. Perhaps the most notable was King Hussein of Jordan. Continue reading the main story Find out more Matthew Teller presents Sandhurst and the Sheikhs, a Whistledown production for BBC Radio 4, on Wednesday 27 August 2014 at 11:00 BST It will be available on iPlayer shortly after broadcast Four reigning Arab monarchs are graduates of Sandhurst and its affiliated colleges - King Abdullah of Jordan, King Hamad of Bahrain, Sheikh Tamim, Emir of Qatar, and Sultan Qaboos of Oman. Past monarchs include Sheikh Saad, Emir of Kuwait, and Sheikh Hamad, Emir of Qatar. Sandhurst's links have continued from the time when Britain was the major colonial power in the Gulf. "One thing the British were excellent at was consolidating their rule through spectacle," says Habiba Hamid, former foreign policy strategist to the rulers of Dubai and Abu Dhabi. "Pomp, ceremony, displays of military might, shock and awe - they all originate from the British military relationship." Sheikh Hamad Bin Isa Al Khalifa, King Abdullah, Sultan Qaboos Sandhurst alumni: King Hamad of Bahrain, King Abdullah of Jordan and Sultan Qaboos of Oman It's a place where future leaders get to know each other, says Michael Stephens, deputy director of the Royal United Services Institute, Qatar. And Sandhurst gives the UK influence in the Gulf. "The [UK] gets the kind of attention from Gulf policy elites that countries of our size, like France and others, don't get. It gives us the ability to punch above our weight. "You have people who've spent time in Britain, they have… connections to their mates, their teachers. Familiarity in politics is very beneficial in the Gulf context." "For British people who are drifting around the world, as I did as a soldier," says Brigadier Peter Sincock, former defence attache to Saudi Arabia, "you find people who were at Sandhurst and you have an immediate rapport. I think that's very helpful, for example, in the field of military sales." The Emir of Dubai Mohammad bin Rashid Al Maktoum with his son after his Passing Out Parade at Sandhurst in 2006 Sheikh Mohammad bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Emir of Dubai, with his son in uniform at Sandhurst in 2006 Her Majesty The Queen's Representative His Highness Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, The Emir of Qatar inspects soldiers during the 144th Sovereign's Parade held at The Royal Military Academy Sandhurst on April 8, 2004 in Camberley, England. Some 470 Officer cadets took part of which 219 were commissioned into the British Army Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, the Emir of Qatar until 2013, inspects soldiers at Sandhurst in 2004 Emotion doesn't always deliver. In 2013, despite the personal intervention of David Cameron, the UAE decided against buying the UK's Typhoon fighter jets. But elsewhere fellow feeling is paying dividends. "The Gulf monarchies have become important sources of capital," says Jane Kinninmont, deputy head of the Middle East/North Africa programme at the foreign affairs think tank Chatham House. "So you see the tallest building in London being financed by the Qataris, you see UK infrastructure and oilfield development being financed by the UAE. There's a desire - it can even seem like a desperation - to keep them onside for trade reasons." British policy in the Gulf is primarily "mercantile", says Dr Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, of the Baker Institute in Houston, Texas. Concerns over human rights and reform are secondary. The Shard at dusk The Shard was funded by Qatari investors In 2012 Sandhurst accepted a £15m donation from the UAE for a new accommodation block, named the Zayed Building after that country's founding ruler. In March 2013, Sandhurst's Mons Hall - a sports centre - was reopened as the King Hamad Hall, following a £3m donation from the monarch of Bahrain, who was educated at one of Sandhurst's affiliated colleges. The renaming proved controversial, partly because of the perceived slight towards the 1,600 British casualties at the Battle of Mons in August 1914 - and partly because of how Hamad and his government have dealt with political protest in Bahrain over the last three years. A critic might note that the third term of Sandhurst's Officer Commissioning Course covers counter-insurgency techniques and ways to manage public disorder. Since tension between Bahrain's majority Shia population and minority Sunni ruling elite boiled over in 2011, more than 80 civilians have died at the hands of the security forces, according to opposition estimates, though the government disputes the figures. Thirteen police officers have also lost their lives in the clashes. "The king has always felt that Sandhurst was a great place," says Sincock, chairman of the Bahrain Society, which promotes friendship between the UK and Bahrain. "Something like 20 of his immediate family have been there as cadets. He didn't really understand why there was such an outcry." David Cameron and King Hamad David Cameron meeting King Hamad in 2012... A protester is held back by police ... while protesters nearby opposed the Bahrain ruler's human rights record Crispin Black, a Sandhurst graduate and former instructor, says the academy should not have taken the money. "Everywhere you look there's a memorial to something, a building or a plaque that serves as a touchstone that takes you right to the heart of British military history. Calling this hall 'King Hamad Hall' ain't gonna do that." Sandhurst gave a written response to the criticism. "All donations to Sandhurst are in compliance with the UK's domestic and international legal obligations and our values as a nation. Over the years donations like this have saved the UK taxpayer a considerable amount of money." But what happens when Sandhurst's friends become enemies? In 2001, then-prime minister Tony Blair visited Damascus, marking a warming of relations between the UK and Syria. Shortly after, in 2003, Sandhurst was training officers from the Syrian armed forces. Now, of course, Syria is an international pariah. Journalist Michael Cockerell has written about Libyan dictator Colonel Gaddafi's time at the Army School of Education in Beaconsfield in 1966: "Three years [later], Gaddafi followed a tradition of foreign officers trained by the British Army. He made use of his newfound knowledge to seize political power in his own country." Ahmed Ali Sandhurst-trained Ahmed Ali was a key player in the Egyptian military's removal of Islamist President Mohammed Morsi That tradition persists. In the 1990s Egyptian colonel Ahmed Ali attended Sandhurst. In 2013 he was one of the key figures in the Egyptian military's removal of Islamist President Mohammed Morsi, now rewarded by a post in President Sisi's inner circle of advisers. In the late 1990s there were moves by the British government under Tony Blair to end Sandhurst's training of overseas cadets. Major-General Arthur Denaro, Middle East adviser to the defence secretary and commandant at Sandhurst in the late 1990s, describes the idea as part of the "ethical foreign policy" advocated by the late Robin Cook, then-foreign secretary. Tony Blair and Robin Cook Tony Blair and Robin Cook at one point planned to end Sandhurst's training of overseas cadets The funeral of King Hussein in 1999 appears to have scuppered the plan. "Coming to that funeral were the heads of state of almost every country in the world - and our prime minister was there, Tony Blair," says Major-General Denaro. "He happened to see me talking to heads of state - the Sultan of Brunei, the Sultan of Oman, the Bahrainis, the Saudis - and he said 'How do you know all these guys?' The answer was because they went to Sandhurst." Today, Sandhurst has reportedly trained more officer cadets from the UAE than from any other country bar the UK. The May 2014 intake included 72 overseas cadets, around 40% of whom were from the Middle East. "In the future," says Maryam al-Khawaja, acting president of the Bahrain Centre for Human Rights, "people will look back at how much Britain messed up in the [Middle East] because they wanted to sell more Typhoon jets to Bahrain, rather than stand behind the values of human rights and democracy." "It's one thing saying we're inculcating benign values, but that's not happening," says Habiba Hamid. Sandhurst is "a relic of the colonial past. They're not [teaching] the civic values we ought to find in democratically elected leaders." line Who else went to Sandhurst? Princes William and Harry, Winston Churchill, Ian Fleming, Katie Hopkins, Antony Beevor, James Blunt, Josh Lewsey, Devon Harris (From left to right) Princes William and Harry Sir Winston Churchill Ian Fleming, creator of James Bond (but did not complete training) Katie Hopkins, reality TV star Antony Beevor, historian James Blunt, singer-songwriter Josh Lewsey, World Cup-winning England rugby player Devon Harris, member of Jamaica's first bobsleigh team line Sandhurst says that "building international relations through military exchanges and education is a key pillar of the UK's international engagement strategy". Sandhurst may be marvellous for the UK, a country where the army is subservient to government, but it is also delivering militarily-trained officers to Middle Eastern monarchies where, often, armies seem to exist to defend not the nation but the ruling family.

Ebola Outbreak: Guinea Declares Emergency As Overall Deaths From Ebola Rise To 1,069