FLASHBACK:Amid Failed Promises of Reform, US Companies Leave China.


Author and director Peter Navarro comments on America's dysfunctional relation with China.


Failed dreams and broken promises are all that remain of the hope that led the United States to open free trade with China in 2001.
President Bill Clinton had told a crowded room a year prior that “if you believe in a future of greater openness and freedom for the people of China, you ought to be for this agreement.” The decision had bipartisan support, and leaders in the United States shared the belief that with the fall of the Soviet Union trade with China would help it move to democracy and freedom.

“They reap all the benefits of international organization, but they don’t abide by the rules.”
— Peter Navarro
Rather than China becoming more free and democratic, many U.S. and Western companies have instead bowed to China’s interests, and many others have faced severe economic harm.
Open trade “didn’t make them more democratic,” said Peter Navarro, director of the film, “Death by China.” Instead, “it made them a more efficient authoritarian machine.”
But now, a change may be happening. Many large companies have begun to feel the impact, and many are now pulling out from China. Best Buy announced on Dec. 4 that it would sell its 184 stores in China and leave the country. It now joins other companies that left China, including Google, Home Depot, Metro, Media Market, Adidas, Panasonic, Rakuten, Nestle, and Danone.
The timing is relevant. The Chinese regime will celebrate the 15th anniversary of its ascension to the World Trade Organization in 2016, and lawmakers in America are now looking at the harm open trade with China has brought to the global economy.

Trade War

“They came in and wreaked havoc on the American economy and the European economy,” Navarro said.
The problem, Navarro said, is that the WTO and the “most-favored-nation” status are meant to bring along a system or rules for free trade. When China was granted these benefits, however, it has used the rules and standards to boost its own trade, yet has not been following the rules when dealing with other nations.
“They reap all the benefits of international organization, but they don’t abide by the rules,” Navarro said.
“Currency manipulation gives China a 25 to 40 percent advantage on the U.S. dollar.”
— Peter Navarro
China’s abuse of its new privileges began immediately. According to Navarro, as soon as the Chinese regime was brought onto the WTO it began flooding the United States with illegally subsidized imports. To top that off, the Chinese military is launching near-constant cyberattacks to steal intellectual property from American companies and is using counterfeits and piracy to undermine U.S. firms.
An estimated 15 to 20 percent of all products made in China are counterfeits, according to a report from MIT Center for International Studies, and close to eight percent of China’s GDP comes from counterfeit goods.
Then there’s China’s currency manipulation—its devaluing of the yuan, which gives China a 25 to 40 percent advantage on the U.S. dollar. Navarro said the effect of China’s currency manipulation is that it gives China’s imports to the United States a subsidy, yet puts a tariff on U.S. imports to China. The effect is that it makes it very easy for China to sell to the United States, yet makes it very costly to sell back to China—and the long-term effect is that Chinese companies dominate the market while U.S. companies get priced out.
Even the numbers on China’s economy are shaky. Fortune Magazine recently reported that China’s stock market is soaring, yet the country is having slower growth and a housing bust. It’s description is that “China’s stock market is not so much defying gravity as defying logic.”
For those keeping tabs, Navarro said, the United States has lost close to 57,000 factories, 25 million Americans are unable to find decent work, and the United States owes a $3 trillion debt to the world’s largest totalitarian nation. Ohio’s The Blade recently reported that trade with China since 2001 has cost 106,400 jobs in Ohio, alone.
And to top it off, the Chinese regime continues to abuse its workers, is growing its increasingly hostile military at an alarming pace, and U.S. firms have been punished in its anti-trust probe.
“It’s a tit-for-tat world and that’s part of the deal,” Navarro said, regarding how the Chinese regime has punished U.S. firms over political issues.

A Hostile Market

China’s stream of abuse seems to be taking its toll, however, and has eroded trust of U.S. firms and government officials, alike.
A survey released on Sept. 2 by the American Chamber of Commerce showed that 60 percent of U.S. firms in China feel less welcomed than before and 49 percent believe they are being singled out by the Chinese regime for attacks.
In a related poll in Europe, 61 percent of foreign companies that have been in China for more than a decade said doing business in China is becoming more difficult.
The only industry the United States enjoys a decent trade surplus with China is agriculture, according to the U.S.-China Economic Security Council’s 2013 report. Yet, even in agriculture, the report warns, China has been using a substantial amount of trade warfare that has experts questioning its true cost.
There is now a growing call for China to start playing by the rules, and Best Buy’s recent pullout could very well tell of what’s to come.
“Today I am calling on China to fully comply with all of its World Trade Organization commitments and fully and faithfully implement all of the WTO rulings against it,” said Senator Sherrod Brown, chairman of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, during a Jan. 25 congressional hearing on China’s compliance with WTO standards.
The poster for documentary film "Death by China." The film's director, Peter Navarro, says that U.S. companies are now pulling out of China amid an increasingly hostile business environment. (DeathByChina.com)
The poster for documentary film “Death by China.” The film’s director, Peter Navarro, says that U.S. companies are now pulling out of China amid an increasingly hostile business environment. (DeathByChina.com)
Brown cited recent data that “paints a sobering picture of the Chinese state’s efforts to intervene in the economy and unfairly help Chinese businesses, despite its WTO commitments not to do so.”
He pointed out that in 2012, the U.S. trade deficit with China was over $300 billion, and a similar number was expected in the 2013 figures. Brown said, “These massive trade deficits are unacceptable and cost jobs in places like Toledo, Akron, and towns and cities all over this country.”
According to Navarro, as the impact of China’s admission to the WTO becomes more clear, companies and U.S. officials are now alert to the problem.
William Reinsch, former undersecretary of commerce for export administration under President Bill Clinton, was once a leading voice supporting U.S. trade with China, but even he has changed his tune.
“It is a real disappointment for me to write these things,” Reinsch stated in a recent report, according to the Washington Free Beacon. “I have always been an optimist about the relationship, but that view is becoming increasingly untenable, as China asserts itself in ways that are inevitably going to bump up against our interests in the region and in multilateral fora.”
For the U.S. companies now pulling out of China, Navarro said, “it’s a simple cost-benefit analysis: the cost is rising, the benefits are going down, and the risk is increasing.”

Some Facts

  • The United States has lost close to 57,000 factories;
  • 25 million Americans are unable to find decent work;
  • The United States owes a $3 trillion debt to the world’s largest totalitarian nation;
  • 60 percent of U.S. firms in China feel less welcomed than before;
  • 49 percent believe they are being singled out by the Chinese regime for attacks (American Chamber of Commerce poll);
  • 15 to 20 percent of all products made in China are counterfeits (MIT Center for International Studies report);
  • Best Buy announced on Dec. 4 that it would sell its 184 stores in China and leave the country. It now joins other companies that left China, including Google, Home Depot, Metro, Media Market, Adidas, Panasonic, Rakuten, Nestle, and Danone.
  •  
  • epochtimes.

Popular posts from this blog

UK GENERAL ELECTIONS:Inquiry announced into memo alleging Sturgeon wants Tory election victory.

Sandhurst's sheikhs: Why do so many Gulf royals receive military training in the UK? A parade outside the building at Sandhurst Continue reading the main story In today's Magazine The death list that names 5,000 victims Is this woman an apostate? Voices from a WW1 prison camp The Swiss selfie scandal Generations of foreign royals - particularly from the Middle East - have learned to be military leaders at the UK's Sandhurst officer training academy. But is that still a good idea, asks Matthew Teller. Since 1812, the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, on the Surrey/Berkshire border, has been where the British Army trains its officers. It has a gruelling 44-week course testing the physical and intellectual skills of officer cadets and imbuing them with the values of the British Army. Alongside would-be British officers, Sandhurst has a tradition of drawing cadets from overseas. Many of the elite families of the Middle East have sent their sons and daughters. Perhaps the most notable was King Hussein of Jordan. Continue reading the main story Find out more Matthew Teller presents Sandhurst and the Sheikhs, a Whistledown production for BBC Radio 4, on Wednesday 27 August 2014 at 11:00 BST It will be available on iPlayer shortly after broadcast Four reigning Arab monarchs are graduates of Sandhurst and its affiliated colleges - King Abdullah of Jordan, King Hamad of Bahrain, Sheikh Tamim, Emir of Qatar, and Sultan Qaboos of Oman. Past monarchs include Sheikh Saad, Emir of Kuwait, and Sheikh Hamad, Emir of Qatar. Sandhurst's links have continued from the time when Britain was the major colonial power in the Gulf. "One thing the British were excellent at was consolidating their rule through spectacle," says Habiba Hamid, former foreign policy strategist to the rulers of Dubai and Abu Dhabi. "Pomp, ceremony, displays of military might, shock and awe - they all originate from the British military relationship." Sheikh Hamad Bin Isa Al Khalifa, King Abdullah, Sultan Qaboos Sandhurst alumni: King Hamad of Bahrain, King Abdullah of Jordan and Sultan Qaboos of Oman It's a place where future leaders get to know each other, says Michael Stephens, deputy director of the Royal United Services Institute, Qatar. And Sandhurst gives the UK influence in the Gulf. "The [UK] gets the kind of attention from Gulf policy elites that countries of our size, like France and others, don't get. It gives us the ability to punch above our weight. "You have people who've spent time in Britain, they have… connections to their mates, their teachers. Familiarity in politics is very beneficial in the Gulf context." "For British people who are drifting around the world, as I did as a soldier," says Brigadier Peter Sincock, former defence attache to Saudi Arabia, "you find people who were at Sandhurst and you have an immediate rapport. I think that's very helpful, for example, in the field of military sales." The Emir of Dubai Mohammad bin Rashid Al Maktoum with his son after his Passing Out Parade at Sandhurst in 2006 Sheikh Mohammad bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Emir of Dubai, with his son in uniform at Sandhurst in 2006 Her Majesty The Queen's Representative His Highness Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, The Emir of Qatar inspects soldiers during the 144th Sovereign's Parade held at The Royal Military Academy Sandhurst on April 8, 2004 in Camberley, England. Some 470 Officer cadets took part of which 219 were commissioned into the British Army Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, the Emir of Qatar until 2013, inspects soldiers at Sandhurst in 2004 Emotion doesn't always deliver. In 2013, despite the personal intervention of David Cameron, the UAE decided against buying the UK's Typhoon fighter jets. But elsewhere fellow feeling is paying dividends. "The Gulf monarchies have become important sources of capital," says Jane Kinninmont, deputy head of the Middle East/North Africa programme at the foreign affairs think tank Chatham House. "So you see the tallest building in London being financed by the Qataris, you see UK infrastructure and oilfield development being financed by the UAE. There's a desire - it can even seem like a desperation - to keep them onside for trade reasons." British policy in the Gulf is primarily "mercantile", says Dr Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, of the Baker Institute in Houston, Texas. Concerns over human rights and reform are secondary. The Shard at dusk The Shard was funded by Qatari investors In 2012 Sandhurst accepted a £15m donation from the UAE for a new accommodation block, named the Zayed Building after that country's founding ruler. In March 2013, Sandhurst's Mons Hall - a sports centre - was reopened as the King Hamad Hall, following a £3m donation from the monarch of Bahrain, who was educated at one of Sandhurst's affiliated colleges. The renaming proved controversial, partly because of the perceived slight towards the 1,600 British casualties at the Battle of Mons in August 1914 - and partly because of how Hamad and his government have dealt with political protest in Bahrain over the last three years. A critic might note that the third term of Sandhurst's Officer Commissioning Course covers counter-insurgency techniques and ways to manage public disorder. Since tension between Bahrain's majority Shia population and minority Sunni ruling elite boiled over in 2011, more than 80 civilians have died at the hands of the security forces, according to opposition estimates, though the government disputes the figures. Thirteen police officers have also lost their lives in the clashes. "The king has always felt that Sandhurst was a great place," says Sincock, chairman of the Bahrain Society, which promotes friendship between the UK and Bahrain. "Something like 20 of his immediate family have been there as cadets. He didn't really understand why there was such an outcry." David Cameron and King Hamad David Cameron meeting King Hamad in 2012... A protester is held back by police ... while protesters nearby opposed the Bahrain ruler's human rights record Crispin Black, a Sandhurst graduate and former instructor, says the academy should not have taken the money. "Everywhere you look there's a memorial to something, a building or a plaque that serves as a touchstone that takes you right to the heart of British military history. Calling this hall 'King Hamad Hall' ain't gonna do that." Sandhurst gave a written response to the criticism. "All donations to Sandhurst are in compliance with the UK's domestic and international legal obligations and our values as a nation. Over the years donations like this have saved the UK taxpayer a considerable amount of money." But what happens when Sandhurst's friends become enemies? In 2001, then-prime minister Tony Blair visited Damascus, marking a warming of relations between the UK and Syria. Shortly after, in 2003, Sandhurst was training officers from the Syrian armed forces. Now, of course, Syria is an international pariah. Journalist Michael Cockerell has written about Libyan dictator Colonel Gaddafi's time at the Army School of Education in Beaconsfield in 1966: "Three years [later], Gaddafi followed a tradition of foreign officers trained by the British Army. He made use of his newfound knowledge to seize political power in his own country." Ahmed Ali Sandhurst-trained Ahmed Ali was a key player in the Egyptian military's removal of Islamist President Mohammed Morsi That tradition persists. In the 1990s Egyptian colonel Ahmed Ali attended Sandhurst. In 2013 he was one of the key figures in the Egyptian military's removal of Islamist President Mohammed Morsi, now rewarded by a post in President Sisi's inner circle of advisers. In the late 1990s there were moves by the British government under Tony Blair to end Sandhurst's training of overseas cadets. Major-General Arthur Denaro, Middle East adviser to the defence secretary and commandant at Sandhurst in the late 1990s, describes the idea as part of the "ethical foreign policy" advocated by the late Robin Cook, then-foreign secretary. Tony Blair and Robin Cook Tony Blair and Robin Cook at one point planned to end Sandhurst's training of overseas cadets The funeral of King Hussein in 1999 appears to have scuppered the plan. "Coming to that funeral were the heads of state of almost every country in the world - and our prime minister was there, Tony Blair," says Major-General Denaro. "He happened to see me talking to heads of state - the Sultan of Brunei, the Sultan of Oman, the Bahrainis, the Saudis - and he said 'How do you know all these guys?' The answer was because they went to Sandhurst." Today, Sandhurst has reportedly trained more officer cadets from the UAE than from any other country bar the UK. The May 2014 intake included 72 overseas cadets, around 40% of whom were from the Middle East. "In the future," says Maryam al-Khawaja, acting president of the Bahrain Centre for Human Rights, "people will look back at how much Britain messed up in the [Middle East] because they wanted to sell more Typhoon jets to Bahrain, rather than stand behind the values of human rights and democracy." "It's one thing saying we're inculcating benign values, but that's not happening," says Habiba Hamid. Sandhurst is "a relic of the colonial past. They're not [teaching] the civic values we ought to find in democratically elected leaders." line Who else went to Sandhurst? Princes William and Harry, Winston Churchill, Ian Fleming, Katie Hopkins, Antony Beevor, James Blunt, Josh Lewsey, Devon Harris (From left to right) Princes William and Harry Sir Winston Churchill Ian Fleming, creator of James Bond (but did not complete training) Katie Hopkins, reality TV star Antony Beevor, historian James Blunt, singer-songwriter Josh Lewsey, World Cup-winning England rugby player Devon Harris, member of Jamaica's first bobsleigh team line Sandhurst says that "building international relations through military exchanges and education is a key pillar of the UK's international engagement strategy". Sandhurst may be marvellous for the UK, a country where the army is subservient to government, but it is also delivering militarily-trained officers to Middle Eastern monarchies where, often, armies seem to exist to defend not the nation but the ruling family.

Ebola Outbreak: Guinea Declares Emergency As Overall Deaths From Ebola Rise To 1,069