Putin's Holy War And The Disintegration Of The "Russian World" 2.

A Christian Orthodox priest blesses pro-Russian militants during a service in the village of Senyonovka, near the eastern Ukrainian city of Slavyansk, on May 26, 2014. AFP PHOTO/ VIKTOR DRACHEV (Photo credit should read VIKTOR DRACHEV/AFP/Getty Images)
Putin justified his annexation of Crimea in predominantly spiritual language, asserting that Crimea has “sacred meaning for Russia, like the Temple Mount for Jews and Muslims”, and that Crimea is “the spiritual source of the formation of the multifaceted but monolithic Russian nation . . . It was on this spiritual soil that our ancestors first and forever recognized their nationhood.”
Religious impulses have long animated Russian attitudes toward Crimea. Few remember today that the Crimean War of the 1850′s was fought by Czarist, Orthodox Russia against the Ottoman Turks (the Muslim superpower of the day), who were allied with Great Britain (which entered the war in order to keep Europe from being dominated by Russia) and Roman Catholic France (which was, among other things, conflicting with Moscow over whether the Roman Catholic or the Orthodox Church would control the holy sites in the Holy Land) over religious divisions as much as anything else with Russia, then as now, viewing itself as the defender of Orthodox Christianity. (Also relevant to the current conflict is the fact that the war gave rise to a Ukrainian national consciousness that eventually led to an independent Ukraine.) Philip Jenkins, a history professor at Baylor University, has written an excellent summary of the historical religious roots of the conflict which can be accessed here.
In Crimea, under Russian rule, severe restrictions on religious practice have been imposed on all non-ROC religionists. Many religious leaders have reported surveillance from the security services and questioning by FSB officers. Jewish synagogues, numerous Muslim mosques, and Christian groups seen as “Western” such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses or pro-Ukrainian, have all experienced police raids and other forms of pressure. All 1,546 religious organizations which held registration as religious organizations under Ukrainian law prior to Russian annexation have been forced to re-register under the new government. According to statistics of the Russian Ministry of Justice, only 1% of those which had such registration status previously have succeeded in regaining such status under the new rule – partially because many did not even apply as they expected their applications to be rejected by the new authorities, and partially because very few of those who did apply were granted legal status. Those groups which do not have legal status do not have the ability to publish literature, have bank accounts, or own property, among other things, meaning that a lack of legal status effectively paralyses groups from virtually all activities that can influence public life.
The vast majority of non-ROC religious leaders in Crimea, particularly those with Ukrainian and other citizenship, have been expelled or face expulsion – the stripping of the legal status of most religious organizations nullified the basis for the visas and residency permits of their leaders, creating the legal justification for their expulsion. Most of the approximately two dozen Turkish imams who had been working in Crimea prior to annexation, for example, have been expelled. The leader of the Salvation Army in Crimea has fled after reporting harassment by security officers, and the home of the bishop of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kievan Patriarchate in Simferopol and Crimea was burned down.
Crimea’s Muslim Tatars the original occupants of the peninsula, which still make up a little over 10% of Crimea’s population, had their last television station in Crimea closed down on April 1. Jews, too, have experienced persecution, with synagogues being defaced with Nazi swastikas, and the prominent Reformed Rabbi Mikhail Kapustin being expelled from Crimea after his outspoken condemnation of Russian annexation.
In rebel-held parts of eastern Ukraine, ROC priests bless the Russian soldiers and pro-Russian rebels fighting, as they see it, for the very soul of humanity. As one priest articulated shortly after visiting Russian troops in Donetsk last year, Ukranian forces and their Western supporters are fighting for “The establishment of planetary Satanic rule.” He went on to explain that “What’s occurring here is the very beginning of a global war. Not for resources or territory, that’s secondary. This is a war for the destruction of true Christianity, Orthodoxy.” Speaking of those who control policy in the West, the priest, known as “Father Viktor”, went on to explain that “They are intentionally hastening the reign of Antichrist.” He then declared that “the soldier is also a monastic, but wages not an inner war with the spirits of evil, but an outer one.”
With apocalytic views such as this dominant among pro-Russian combatants and spread by the ROC, it is perhaps not surprising that there are widespread reports that non-ROC religionists are being targeted by pro-Russian militias and are being kidnaped, tortured and killed. The rebel government in Donetsk, the self-styled “People’s Republic of Donetsk”, which has declared the ROC its official religion, has been particularly aggressive in its crackdown on non-ROC believers. Many Protestant and other non-ROC believers have fled to Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second largest city, which is still controlled by the Ukrainian government. A refugee camp outside of the city has grown up in the past few months composed of non-ROC Christians fleeing persecution in Donetsk.
Rebel Donetsk authorities have closed Donetsk Christian University, which is Baptist, and have also been reported by displaced ministers to have seized Protestant church facilities and begun using them as weapons storage facilities. Segiv Kosiak, pastor of Word of Life Evangelical Church in Donetsk, reported that armed men stormed his church, declaring that the church would be destroyed, and threatening clergy and parishioners with the firing squad if they protested.  Human Rights Watch has reported numerous examples of arbitrary detention and torture, including one report of an evangelical pastor from Donetsk who was arrested and tortured merely for holding an ecumenical prayer marathon for peace and unity in this region torn apart by war.
Part of the reason for the persecution of Protestants, in particular, is that many of the Protestant groups in Ukraine have strong links to the United States, which immediately makes them suspect. Protestants are therefore viewed as, at a minimum, being liable to spread “corrupting” influences, and, possibly even being American spies. Catholics, too, both Latin and Greek, have been aggressively persecuted, although the Greek Catholic Church, which is based primarily in western Ukraine, is pro-European, and was one of the strongest supporters of the Maidan protests, has come in for special attention. Archbishop Thomas Gullickson, the apostolic nuncio to Ukraine, has stated that “Any number of statements emanating from the Kremlin of late leave little doubt of Russian Orthodox hostility and intolerance toward Ukrainian Greek-Catholics”, and has warned that the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church is “menaced with extinction” both in Crimea by the Russian authorities and in eastern Ukraine by the pro-Russian rebels. He went on to predict regarding Crimea that “If Russia remains in control of the region, it is hard to imagine that Catholic life, whether Greek or Latin, would be allowed to return.”
As in Crimea, it is not just non-ROC Christians who are experiencing persecution in the portions of eastern Ukraine that are rebel-held. According to the Jerusalem Post, the vast majority of the approximately 10,000 strong Jewish community that existed in Donetsk prior to the Russian-inspired rebellion have fled, leaving the city virtually devoid of Jews. As Russian troops and their pro-Russian rebel allies have advanced, Ukraine’s Jews have had to move further into Ukrainian-government held territory.
For their part, believers belonging to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church – Kievan Patriarchate, the Ukrainian Orthodox Autocephalous Church, Catholics, Protestants, etc., have been assisting the Ukrainian soldiers in their fight against the rebels and the Russian forces in eastern Ukraine. The Patriarch of the independent Ukrainian Orthodox Church, Filaret, has directly challenged Putin’s spiritual claims, lamenting the fact that Putin “is misleading some people, and they think that in fact this ruler protects traditional spiritual and moral values from the ravages of globalization. But the fruit of his actions, which the Gospel calls us to evaluate, suggest otherwise.” Filaret has called on Putin “to stop sowing evil and death, [and] to repent”, and has gone so far as to say that Putin has been possessed by Satan. Ukraine has had a history of religious diversity, yet the political polarization within Ukraine has been mirrored by an increasing religious polarization.
The cultural impulses that are driving the revival of state-based religious fervor from within Russia are deeply enough ensconced within Russian society that a mere change of Russian leadership at some future point is unlikely to address the issue. Rather than building a new Orthodox empire, however, Putin’s aggressive and neo-imperial actions, encouraged by a militant Russian Orthodoxy, have served to alienate those peoples living around Russia’s periphery, making it increasingly unlikely that Putin will find success in his efforts to build a “Russian world.”
forbes.

Popular posts from this blog

UK GENERAL ELECTIONS:Inquiry announced into memo alleging Sturgeon wants Tory election victory.

Sandhurst's sheikhs: Why do so many Gulf royals receive military training in the UK? A parade outside the building at Sandhurst Continue reading the main story In today's Magazine The death list that names 5,000 victims Is this woman an apostate? Voices from a WW1 prison camp The Swiss selfie scandal Generations of foreign royals - particularly from the Middle East - have learned to be military leaders at the UK's Sandhurst officer training academy. But is that still a good idea, asks Matthew Teller. Since 1812, the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, on the Surrey/Berkshire border, has been where the British Army trains its officers. It has a gruelling 44-week course testing the physical and intellectual skills of officer cadets and imbuing them with the values of the British Army. Alongside would-be British officers, Sandhurst has a tradition of drawing cadets from overseas. Many of the elite families of the Middle East have sent their sons and daughters. Perhaps the most notable was King Hussein of Jordan. Continue reading the main story Find out more Matthew Teller presents Sandhurst and the Sheikhs, a Whistledown production for BBC Radio 4, on Wednesday 27 August 2014 at 11:00 BST It will be available on iPlayer shortly after broadcast Four reigning Arab monarchs are graduates of Sandhurst and its affiliated colleges - King Abdullah of Jordan, King Hamad of Bahrain, Sheikh Tamim, Emir of Qatar, and Sultan Qaboos of Oman. Past monarchs include Sheikh Saad, Emir of Kuwait, and Sheikh Hamad, Emir of Qatar. Sandhurst's links have continued from the time when Britain was the major colonial power in the Gulf. "One thing the British were excellent at was consolidating their rule through spectacle," says Habiba Hamid, former foreign policy strategist to the rulers of Dubai and Abu Dhabi. "Pomp, ceremony, displays of military might, shock and awe - they all originate from the British military relationship." Sheikh Hamad Bin Isa Al Khalifa, King Abdullah, Sultan Qaboos Sandhurst alumni: King Hamad of Bahrain, King Abdullah of Jordan and Sultan Qaboos of Oman It's a place where future leaders get to know each other, says Michael Stephens, deputy director of the Royal United Services Institute, Qatar. And Sandhurst gives the UK influence in the Gulf. "The [UK] gets the kind of attention from Gulf policy elites that countries of our size, like France and others, don't get. It gives us the ability to punch above our weight. "You have people who've spent time in Britain, they have… connections to their mates, their teachers. Familiarity in politics is very beneficial in the Gulf context." "For British people who are drifting around the world, as I did as a soldier," says Brigadier Peter Sincock, former defence attache to Saudi Arabia, "you find people who were at Sandhurst and you have an immediate rapport. I think that's very helpful, for example, in the field of military sales." The Emir of Dubai Mohammad bin Rashid Al Maktoum with his son after his Passing Out Parade at Sandhurst in 2006 Sheikh Mohammad bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Emir of Dubai, with his son in uniform at Sandhurst in 2006 Her Majesty The Queen's Representative His Highness Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, The Emir of Qatar inspects soldiers during the 144th Sovereign's Parade held at The Royal Military Academy Sandhurst on April 8, 2004 in Camberley, England. Some 470 Officer cadets took part of which 219 were commissioned into the British Army Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, the Emir of Qatar until 2013, inspects soldiers at Sandhurst in 2004 Emotion doesn't always deliver. In 2013, despite the personal intervention of David Cameron, the UAE decided against buying the UK's Typhoon fighter jets. But elsewhere fellow feeling is paying dividends. "The Gulf monarchies have become important sources of capital," says Jane Kinninmont, deputy head of the Middle East/North Africa programme at the foreign affairs think tank Chatham House. "So you see the tallest building in London being financed by the Qataris, you see UK infrastructure and oilfield development being financed by the UAE. There's a desire - it can even seem like a desperation - to keep them onside for trade reasons." British policy in the Gulf is primarily "mercantile", says Dr Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, of the Baker Institute in Houston, Texas. Concerns over human rights and reform are secondary. The Shard at dusk The Shard was funded by Qatari investors In 2012 Sandhurst accepted a £15m donation from the UAE for a new accommodation block, named the Zayed Building after that country's founding ruler. In March 2013, Sandhurst's Mons Hall - a sports centre - was reopened as the King Hamad Hall, following a £3m donation from the monarch of Bahrain, who was educated at one of Sandhurst's affiliated colleges. The renaming proved controversial, partly because of the perceived slight towards the 1,600 British casualties at the Battle of Mons in August 1914 - and partly because of how Hamad and his government have dealt with political protest in Bahrain over the last three years. A critic might note that the third term of Sandhurst's Officer Commissioning Course covers counter-insurgency techniques and ways to manage public disorder. Since tension between Bahrain's majority Shia population and minority Sunni ruling elite boiled over in 2011, more than 80 civilians have died at the hands of the security forces, according to opposition estimates, though the government disputes the figures. Thirteen police officers have also lost their lives in the clashes. "The king has always felt that Sandhurst was a great place," says Sincock, chairman of the Bahrain Society, which promotes friendship between the UK and Bahrain. "Something like 20 of his immediate family have been there as cadets. He didn't really understand why there was such an outcry." David Cameron and King Hamad David Cameron meeting King Hamad in 2012... A protester is held back by police ... while protesters nearby opposed the Bahrain ruler's human rights record Crispin Black, a Sandhurst graduate and former instructor, says the academy should not have taken the money. "Everywhere you look there's a memorial to something, a building or a plaque that serves as a touchstone that takes you right to the heart of British military history. Calling this hall 'King Hamad Hall' ain't gonna do that." Sandhurst gave a written response to the criticism. "All donations to Sandhurst are in compliance with the UK's domestic and international legal obligations and our values as a nation. Over the years donations like this have saved the UK taxpayer a considerable amount of money." But what happens when Sandhurst's friends become enemies? In 2001, then-prime minister Tony Blair visited Damascus, marking a warming of relations between the UK and Syria. Shortly after, in 2003, Sandhurst was training officers from the Syrian armed forces. Now, of course, Syria is an international pariah. Journalist Michael Cockerell has written about Libyan dictator Colonel Gaddafi's time at the Army School of Education in Beaconsfield in 1966: "Three years [later], Gaddafi followed a tradition of foreign officers trained by the British Army. He made use of his newfound knowledge to seize political power in his own country." Ahmed Ali Sandhurst-trained Ahmed Ali was a key player in the Egyptian military's removal of Islamist President Mohammed Morsi That tradition persists. In the 1990s Egyptian colonel Ahmed Ali attended Sandhurst. In 2013 he was one of the key figures in the Egyptian military's removal of Islamist President Mohammed Morsi, now rewarded by a post in President Sisi's inner circle of advisers. In the late 1990s there were moves by the British government under Tony Blair to end Sandhurst's training of overseas cadets. Major-General Arthur Denaro, Middle East adviser to the defence secretary and commandant at Sandhurst in the late 1990s, describes the idea as part of the "ethical foreign policy" advocated by the late Robin Cook, then-foreign secretary. Tony Blair and Robin Cook Tony Blair and Robin Cook at one point planned to end Sandhurst's training of overseas cadets The funeral of King Hussein in 1999 appears to have scuppered the plan. "Coming to that funeral were the heads of state of almost every country in the world - and our prime minister was there, Tony Blair," says Major-General Denaro. "He happened to see me talking to heads of state - the Sultan of Brunei, the Sultan of Oman, the Bahrainis, the Saudis - and he said 'How do you know all these guys?' The answer was because they went to Sandhurst." Today, Sandhurst has reportedly trained more officer cadets from the UAE than from any other country bar the UK. The May 2014 intake included 72 overseas cadets, around 40% of whom were from the Middle East. "In the future," says Maryam al-Khawaja, acting president of the Bahrain Centre for Human Rights, "people will look back at how much Britain messed up in the [Middle East] because they wanted to sell more Typhoon jets to Bahrain, rather than stand behind the values of human rights and democracy." "It's one thing saying we're inculcating benign values, but that's not happening," says Habiba Hamid. Sandhurst is "a relic of the colonial past. They're not [teaching] the civic values we ought to find in democratically elected leaders." line Who else went to Sandhurst? Princes William and Harry, Winston Churchill, Ian Fleming, Katie Hopkins, Antony Beevor, James Blunt, Josh Lewsey, Devon Harris (From left to right) Princes William and Harry Sir Winston Churchill Ian Fleming, creator of James Bond (but did not complete training) Katie Hopkins, reality TV star Antony Beevor, historian James Blunt, singer-songwriter Josh Lewsey, World Cup-winning England rugby player Devon Harris, member of Jamaica's first bobsleigh team line Sandhurst says that "building international relations through military exchanges and education is a key pillar of the UK's international engagement strategy". Sandhurst may be marvellous for the UK, a country where the army is subservient to government, but it is also delivering militarily-trained officers to Middle Eastern monarchies where, often, armies seem to exist to defend not the nation but the ruling family.

Ebola Outbreak: Guinea Declares Emergency As Overall Deaths From Ebola Rise To 1,069