INCONTINENCE.


Disclaimer: There are affiliate links in this article.If you click and buy the products,commissions will be earned by me at no cost to you.Thanks for the anticipated understanding..


As babies our bladders and bowels function involuntarily and automatically. In early childhood we are trained to identify acceptable places and control excretion by the discipline of praise (keeping dry and not wetting the bed). Once control has been achieved any failure causes embarrassment which continues to occur at any age.


To avoid this, only ‘acceptable’ voiding is allowed so a given individual must be able to identify an acceptable place and get there safely. Advancing age and increasing disability can lower the threshold for control but incontinence is not an inevitable outcome of ageing.

Incontinence is an involuntary loss of urine or faeces in an inappropriate place. This implies that there were no physical or psychological barriers preventing access to an acceptable place but despite this the person excreted inappropriately. This necessitates a thorough investigation as many causes of involuntary loss of control are amenable to medical and surgical management.



ACCEPTABLE PLACES

These are dependent upon a host of factors such as age, sex, social class, society, nationality and present circumstances. The driver of a hansom cab is allowed by law to urinate against the rear offside wheel of his cab. This law has never been repealed, but putting it to the test would probably result in an arrest for obscene behaviour in a public place. Peasant farmers squat down in fields around the world, but Oxford Street (which was once a field) is certainly not now acceptable; society here has decreed the use of private lavatories or public conveniences.


Most people have no problem in identifying acceptable places. Difficulties arise, how-ever, when one is unaware of the location. This can happen to anyone in a strange town or building and is a plight experienced by people with dementia; they know they should get to an acceptable place but they cannot find it. If directed, continence results; if not, the near-est suitable alternative (bin or sink) is used rather than be wet.


There is no difference in behaviour between the demented patient and someone unable to find a toilet who urinates in the bushes or up against a Wall. In hospitals the lack of suitable toilets is a common cause of loss of continence. Patients may be aware of the need to go, of where to go and of acceptable alternatives (commodes) but are unable to get to them in time.



Some patients are placed on incontinence pads in bed, psychologically inviting loss of control. The necessity to get up at night to urinate increases with advancing age. High beds, night sedatives, cot-sides and shortage of help combine to prevent patients from getting to the toilet. It is essential that commodes and toilets be near the beds and chairs of elderly patients.



GETTING THERE

Psychological barriers

The indignity of being inadequately clothed (split-back nightdresses, pyiama bottoms that fall down) means that many people are incontinent rather than shame themselves crossing a semi-public Ward area ‘naked’. Loss of mobility This is the commonest cause of difficulty both in the community and in institutions. Most public conveniences were designed for the physically able.


There are few with access and facilities for the disabled. People taking diuretics or those with bladder or bowel control difficulties often have to plan routes on the basis of available toilet facilities; more commonly they become house bound. There is no need for architects and town planners to experience being old, a test dose of a fast-acting diuretic taken in the middle of a shopping precinct should concentrate the mind!



Location of toilet

An outside toilet requires that to be continent one must get outside (whatever the weather) or use another receptacle. Toilets upstairs depend on good physical mobility. Thus many elderly people who are ill at home have been ‘incontinent’ before they enter hospital, their illness preventing them from reaching the toilet. The loss of control is due to illness and associated immobility, not their age. A bedside commode may have enabled them to remain continent.


How they are treated in hospital will influence whether incontinence becomes an established pattern or not. 



Ward toilets

The majority of hospital wards have too few toilets, often providing only two for 20-30 people. If we really expected people to be continent we would provide (as in hotels) a lavatory for each patient next to the bed. Most patients have to walk long distances then wait, Toilet doors are often heavy and the space may not permit a wheel chair or walking frame. Unless specifically designed, the seat will be too low, with no hand rails and toilet paper on a roll.


Try going to the toilet using only one hand, balancing on one leg and get a few pieces of paper off the roll at a time (this is often a situation stroke patients find themselves in).


Bad design Many hospitals are still equipped with old-fashioned high beds so that nearly all elderly patients need assistance to get in and out. If someone does try to get out unaided they either fall or sides are put up. If the bed is adjustable and set correctly most patients can get out unaided and cot-sides are certainly unnecessary.



Use of bed pans

The gymnastic prowess necessary to straddle a bed pan and maintain balance and position on it is difficult and exhausting for most elderly patients. The sheer act becomes one of dread and putting off its use can lead to retention and constipation with later face all incontinence due to overflow (spurious diarrhoea). A bedside mmmnde is easier to use.



Chairs

The correct chair is one that a person can get out of easily. Properly dressed (With underclothes), sitting in a chair of the correct height with a walking frame nearby, the majority of elderly patients can get to the toilet independently. They cannot do this if the chair is too high or too low, if they are trapped by a fixed table or if they feel inadequately dressed or cannot reach their walking frame.



Mercyvill.



Popular posts from this blog

UK GENERAL ELECTIONS:Inquiry announced into memo alleging Sturgeon wants Tory election victory.

Sandhurst's sheikhs: Why do so many Gulf royals receive military training in the UK? A parade outside the building at Sandhurst Continue reading the main story In today's Magazine The death list that names 5,000 victims Is this woman an apostate? Voices from a WW1 prison camp The Swiss selfie scandal Generations of foreign royals - particularly from the Middle East - have learned to be military leaders at the UK's Sandhurst officer training academy. But is that still a good idea, asks Matthew Teller. Since 1812, the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, on the Surrey/Berkshire border, has been where the British Army trains its officers. It has a gruelling 44-week course testing the physical and intellectual skills of officer cadets and imbuing them with the values of the British Army. Alongside would-be British officers, Sandhurst has a tradition of drawing cadets from overseas. Many of the elite families of the Middle East have sent their sons and daughters. Perhaps the most notable was King Hussein of Jordan. Continue reading the main story Find out more Matthew Teller presents Sandhurst and the Sheikhs, a Whistledown production for BBC Radio 4, on Wednesday 27 August 2014 at 11:00 BST It will be available on iPlayer shortly after broadcast Four reigning Arab monarchs are graduates of Sandhurst and its affiliated colleges - King Abdullah of Jordan, King Hamad of Bahrain, Sheikh Tamim, Emir of Qatar, and Sultan Qaboos of Oman. Past monarchs include Sheikh Saad, Emir of Kuwait, and Sheikh Hamad, Emir of Qatar. Sandhurst's links have continued from the time when Britain was the major colonial power in the Gulf. "One thing the British were excellent at was consolidating their rule through spectacle," says Habiba Hamid, former foreign policy strategist to the rulers of Dubai and Abu Dhabi. "Pomp, ceremony, displays of military might, shock and awe - they all originate from the British military relationship." Sheikh Hamad Bin Isa Al Khalifa, King Abdullah, Sultan Qaboos Sandhurst alumni: King Hamad of Bahrain, King Abdullah of Jordan and Sultan Qaboos of Oman It's a place where future leaders get to know each other, says Michael Stephens, deputy director of the Royal United Services Institute, Qatar. And Sandhurst gives the UK influence in the Gulf. "The [UK] gets the kind of attention from Gulf policy elites that countries of our size, like France and others, don't get. It gives us the ability to punch above our weight. "You have people who've spent time in Britain, they have… connections to their mates, their teachers. Familiarity in politics is very beneficial in the Gulf context." "For British people who are drifting around the world, as I did as a soldier," says Brigadier Peter Sincock, former defence attache to Saudi Arabia, "you find people who were at Sandhurst and you have an immediate rapport. I think that's very helpful, for example, in the field of military sales." The Emir of Dubai Mohammad bin Rashid Al Maktoum with his son after his Passing Out Parade at Sandhurst in 2006 Sheikh Mohammad bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Emir of Dubai, with his son in uniform at Sandhurst in 2006 Her Majesty The Queen's Representative His Highness Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, The Emir of Qatar inspects soldiers during the 144th Sovereign's Parade held at The Royal Military Academy Sandhurst on April 8, 2004 in Camberley, England. Some 470 Officer cadets took part of which 219 were commissioned into the British Army Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, the Emir of Qatar until 2013, inspects soldiers at Sandhurst in 2004 Emotion doesn't always deliver. In 2013, despite the personal intervention of David Cameron, the UAE decided against buying the UK's Typhoon fighter jets. But elsewhere fellow feeling is paying dividends. "The Gulf monarchies have become important sources of capital," says Jane Kinninmont, deputy head of the Middle East/North Africa programme at the foreign affairs think tank Chatham House. "So you see the tallest building in London being financed by the Qataris, you see UK infrastructure and oilfield development being financed by the UAE. There's a desire - it can even seem like a desperation - to keep them onside for trade reasons." British policy in the Gulf is primarily "mercantile", says Dr Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, of the Baker Institute in Houston, Texas. Concerns over human rights and reform are secondary. The Shard at dusk The Shard was funded by Qatari investors In 2012 Sandhurst accepted a £15m donation from the UAE for a new accommodation block, named the Zayed Building after that country's founding ruler. In March 2013, Sandhurst's Mons Hall - a sports centre - was reopened as the King Hamad Hall, following a £3m donation from the monarch of Bahrain, who was educated at one of Sandhurst's affiliated colleges. The renaming proved controversial, partly because of the perceived slight towards the 1,600 British casualties at the Battle of Mons in August 1914 - and partly because of how Hamad and his government have dealt with political protest in Bahrain over the last three years. A critic might note that the third term of Sandhurst's Officer Commissioning Course covers counter-insurgency techniques and ways to manage public disorder. Since tension between Bahrain's majority Shia population and minority Sunni ruling elite boiled over in 2011, more than 80 civilians have died at the hands of the security forces, according to opposition estimates, though the government disputes the figures. Thirteen police officers have also lost their lives in the clashes. "The king has always felt that Sandhurst was a great place," says Sincock, chairman of the Bahrain Society, which promotes friendship between the UK and Bahrain. "Something like 20 of his immediate family have been there as cadets. He didn't really understand why there was such an outcry." David Cameron and King Hamad David Cameron meeting King Hamad in 2012... A protester is held back by police ... while protesters nearby opposed the Bahrain ruler's human rights record Crispin Black, a Sandhurst graduate and former instructor, says the academy should not have taken the money. "Everywhere you look there's a memorial to something, a building or a plaque that serves as a touchstone that takes you right to the heart of British military history. Calling this hall 'King Hamad Hall' ain't gonna do that." Sandhurst gave a written response to the criticism. "All donations to Sandhurst are in compliance with the UK's domestic and international legal obligations and our values as a nation. Over the years donations like this have saved the UK taxpayer a considerable amount of money." But what happens when Sandhurst's friends become enemies? In 2001, then-prime minister Tony Blair visited Damascus, marking a warming of relations between the UK and Syria. Shortly after, in 2003, Sandhurst was training officers from the Syrian armed forces. Now, of course, Syria is an international pariah. Journalist Michael Cockerell has written about Libyan dictator Colonel Gaddafi's time at the Army School of Education in Beaconsfield in 1966: "Three years [later], Gaddafi followed a tradition of foreign officers trained by the British Army. He made use of his newfound knowledge to seize political power in his own country." Ahmed Ali Sandhurst-trained Ahmed Ali was a key player in the Egyptian military's removal of Islamist President Mohammed Morsi That tradition persists. In the 1990s Egyptian colonel Ahmed Ali attended Sandhurst. In 2013 he was one of the key figures in the Egyptian military's removal of Islamist President Mohammed Morsi, now rewarded by a post in President Sisi's inner circle of advisers. In the late 1990s there were moves by the British government under Tony Blair to end Sandhurst's training of overseas cadets. Major-General Arthur Denaro, Middle East adviser to the defence secretary and commandant at Sandhurst in the late 1990s, describes the idea as part of the "ethical foreign policy" advocated by the late Robin Cook, then-foreign secretary. Tony Blair and Robin Cook Tony Blair and Robin Cook at one point planned to end Sandhurst's training of overseas cadets The funeral of King Hussein in 1999 appears to have scuppered the plan. "Coming to that funeral were the heads of state of almost every country in the world - and our prime minister was there, Tony Blair," says Major-General Denaro. "He happened to see me talking to heads of state - the Sultan of Brunei, the Sultan of Oman, the Bahrainis, the Saudis - and he said 'How do you know all these guys?' The answer was because they went to Sandhurst." Today, Sandhurst has reportedly trained more officer cadets from the UAE than from any other country bar the UK. The May 2014 intake included 72 overseas cadets, around 40% of whom were from the Middle East. "In the future," says Maryam al-Khawaja, acting president of the Bahrain Centre for Human Rights, "people will look back at how much Britain messed up in the [Middle East] because they wanted to sell more Typhoon jets to Bahrain, rather than stand behind the values of human rights and democracy." "It's one thing saying we're inculcating benign values, but that's not happening," says Habiba Hamid. Sandhurst is "a relic of the colonial past. They're not [teaching] the civic values we ought to find in democratically elected leaders." line Who else went to Sandhurst? Princes William and Harry, Winston Churchill, Ian Fleming, Katie Hopkins, Antony Beevor, James Blunt, Josh Lewsey, Devon Harris (From left to right) Princes William and Harry Sir Winston Churchill Ian Fleming, creator of James Bond (but did not complete training) Katie Hopkins, reality TV star Antony Beevor, historian James Blunt, singer-songwriter Josh Lewsey, World Cup-winning England rugby player Devon Harris, member of Jamaica's first bobsleigh team line Sandhurst says that "building international relations through military exchanges and education is a key pillar of the UK's international engagement strategy". Sandhurst may be marvellous for the UK, a country where the army is subservient to government, but it is also delivering militarily-trained officers to Middle Eastern monarchies where, often, armies seem to exist to defend not the nation but the ruling family.

Ebola Outbreak: Guinea Declares Emergency As Overall Deaths From Ebola Rise To 1,069